Ecologically Valid Curriculum

We utilize curriculum from UCLA’s PEERS®, UC Davis’ Mind Institute, and other heavily researched therapy approaches that have shown to improve social skills for neurodiverse people.

PEERS®

The Peers® program is world-renowned for providing evidence based online social skills treatment for adolescents and young adults.

Mind Institute

The ACCESS program from the Mind Institute at UC Davis is a group therapy for adults on the autism spectrum and their families.

S Groups

We use carefully selected elements of other evidence based therapy approaches that are shown to work with people with autism and other neurodiversity.

Key Findings From Social Skills Training Research

Learn critical social skills that build confidence, reduce social anxiety, and lead to meaningful friendships.

Improved Social Skills

Improvement in social responsiveness and general social skills.

Better Friendships

More time spent meeting with friends and interacting socially.
Reduced Behaviors
Studies show a decrease in problem behaviors upon completion of PEERSⓇ.
Training of social skills for Autism and related disorders
Effective Telehealth
Telehealth is as effective as in-person treatment for improving social skills.

Evidence Based Methods for Teaching Social Skills

The following has been shown to be effective for teaching social skills:

Source: (Matson, 1984; Davies & Rogers, 1985; Fleming & Fleming, 1982; Mesibov, 1984; Gresham, Sugai, & Horner, 2001; Gralinski & Kopp, 1993; Rubin & Sloman, 1984, Frankel & Myatt, 2003; Rao, Beidel, & Murray, 2008; Laugesonet al., 2008)

Telehealth Efficacy

Research out of UCLA demonstrated efficacy in improving social skills for autistic youth via telehealth.

The findings found that PEERS via telehealth resulted in:

Significant decrease in:

Significant improvement in:

Source: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Telehealth Vs In-Person Delivery

Research found that telehealth delivery was relatively equivalent to in-person treatment, suggesting that teens on the autism spectrum were able to learn important friendship skills in a remote earning context.

The findings found that PEERS via telehealth resulted in:

No significant differences across treatment modalities in:

Source: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Why Do We Target Friendships and Coping Skills?

Research has shown that neurodivergent youth tend to have very few close reciprocal friendships, poor friendship quality, less security in relationships, less involvement in social activities and increased social isolation entering adulthood. That is why we focus on helping you learn how to develop and maintain friendships.
Having one or two close friends:

Correlates negatively with:

Source: Howlinet al., 2013; Orsmond et al., 2013; Howlinet al., 2014; Tobin et al., 2013; Reichow et al., 2010

Making Friends and Learning Coping Skills can Reduce Depression

Having one or two friends lowers the likelihood of experiencing depression and anxiety and helps protect against peer rejection and victimization.

Research shows that teaching emotion recognition and understanding; theory of mind; and executive functions/real life type problem solving reduced the depression significantly on a depression inventory score post treatment.
Source: A Social Adjustment Enhancement Intervention for High Functioning Autism, Asperger Syndrome, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder NOS. Solomon M, Goodlin-Jones BL, Anders TF. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Dec;34(6):649-68.

The Consequences of Peer Rejection

We focus on developing and maintaining friendships, and help finding a source of friends because friendships are known to protect against the consequences of peer rejection and protect against victimization in autistic youth.
Peer rejection is one of the strongest predictors of::
Source: Poteat & Espelage, 2007; Nansel et al., 2001; Espelage & Swearer, 2003; Hawker & Boulton, 2000; Schwartz, 2010; Perry et al., 2001; Doren et al., 1996; Little, 2001, 2002; Montes & Halterman, 2007; van Roekel et al., 2010; Whitney et al., 1992, Martlew & Hodson, 1991; O’Moore and Hillery, 1989